Pink Tinged Cervical Mucus 1 Week After Period

WHY LEGISLATORS AND THE PRESIDENT SHOULD DECLINE TO INTERVENE IN THE ISSUE OF THE RE-ELECTION BOYCOTT

Legislators and the President of the Republic are the least suited to discuss the re-election, much less propose, since there is a clear conflict of interest is that they are deciding on their own stay in public office and the citizens leave us only a minimal form of control is through the vote, they do not include the revocation of the mandate would the natural antidote to a bad public servant.

In this case what they are doing is equal to an employee or a worker was the one who decides how many years will take the contract at the company, ie, that it described itself and not the master, who is the true index to grade your work.

Returning to vote, is a device that has become a reliable tool in Mexico as the elections are decided by many factors that are not listed as excessive resources spent on campaigns, electoral usufruct poverty by giving people handouts and gifts, popular ignorance and misinformation about the candidates and their history , media to promote political candidates or parties in exchange for favors, etc..

In the field of Public Administation is the Federal Law of Administrative Responsibilities of Public Servants and the jurisdiction is the Organic Law of the Superior Court of Justice of Mexico City, which clearly state the prohibition on public servants with obvious interests in a case should apologize and refrain from engaging in it, as they are capable of that their decisions be influenced by those interests, lack of impartiality, strict sense of justice and without looking for the good of the parties or society.

citizens are the ones who say we should not touch issues in Congress and what not. The re-election has not been a popular claim, then why no public consensus Felipe Calderón decides unilaterally to submit the bill before Congress, pushing aside the people, that's the one to serve.

In this case, as in many others, Mexican politicians put us to dance at their own pace, being that there are other issues that do have priority and which have actually been claimed by the company constantly.

The Reelection put on the agenda the President as they say in my village, "with their guns."

Male Swimmers Buttocks

CITIZEN OR CIVIC.

The Agenda of the issues addressed at the public and affecting the lives of all, has traditionally been fixed and established by the political class and the people only makes them less reactive role, responding to the onslaught of political and respond to whatever, and also the times are set for them.

This leaves us to Citizens in a very disadvantageous position because not knowing in advance issues to be addressed, we are not prepared for them, the analysis, the study, information, etc. Which favors the majority of boat-people respond quickly, ie, the first thing that comes to mind or think, without proper prior analysis. And that answer is often influenced by the powers that are commonly the media, same as traditional Mexico is also to be in sync and in accordance with the powers of State in the making.

In a way that is easy for people that thought or feeling manipulated by interests that are not best for the country but for the political class and business media in exchange for favors support the authorities in charge.

This dynamic must be changed in favor of the City, which ultimately is the one who keeps the whole system through taxes. Some options that people have to express their disagreement with the Agenda "Official" are the protests or industrial action as a boycott. In the U.S. consumers use it frequently and with success against business or commercial abuse, expressing his dissatisfaction with prices and conditions of sale, etc.

But the boycott beyond trade issues may have higher goals, used as a tool to express discontent citizens against abusive governments or authorities who like to ignore the opinion of the population. A boycott might call this citizen or civic boycott. And it is particularly the case of Mexico, although this situation is also in several countries around the world.

The boycott citizen or civic group can call for actions that are not necessarily illegal, but they are completely legitimate, for example one is voting no is a way to express discontent against the political system in general. Another form of boycott is not paying taxes, although this may fall into what is obviously illegal because the laws make the political class and all that protects them and not to establish it as an illegal citizen.

A boycott little used but has great strength is not abiding by the rules issued by the authority and eventually achieved the amendment of the standard. Recall that one of the sources of law is the custom, and since the custom becomes law then you can make a law not met repeatedly, can be modified. In fact when we appeal to the judicial authority, ie the judges and argue why we do not follow a certain law, then you can generate Court to amend the standard.

currently in Mexico and despite polls showing that the vast majority of citizens (+ / - 70%) disagree to approve the reelection of public servants continued despite these results, the President Calderon submitted to Congress and the initiative for this purpose, then the boycott could result in protests, not to pay taxes or vote no and the commercial aspect You can boycott the media that drive the government's proposals going against popular sentiment.

boycotts in civic play a key role of organized groups, whether online or civil associations or civic or citizen groups, as are those who can direct the best ways to carry out the boycott. The so-called nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to receive public resources hardly may withdraw from the government, so it is preferable not to contaminate the movements, they are led by organized groups that are completely independent of the authority.

Bathtub Mats Without Suction Cups

WHY THE PARTY SYSTEM (partidocracia) AND NOT WORKING IN MEXICO. 3 .-

Initially, in Mexico's political parties had defined ideologies. I speak of the post-independence times (eighteenth century) and post-revolutionary times. At that time political parties had positions very clear about their government projects, including projects on forming the country. In the years following independence, some fought because the country was ruled by a centralized system, others by a federal system, others for a monarchy (imported from Europe, similar to what happened in the U.S.). So ideologies were defined.

hundred years later, at the end of the Porfiriato and in order to end the 30-year rule of Porfirio Díaz, there are new political parties, each struggling against the reelection of President Diaz, others by a socialist regime based on Marxist principles . In these times come the National Revolutionary Party (PNR, PRI now) and the Partido Accion Nacional (PAN). The first with a speech that claimed the revolutionary principles "effective suffrage, no reelection", the second basis in a humanistic-Christian doctrine and Aristotelian as the "common good." They also raise the Mexican Communist Party, the Popular Socialist Party, the Authentic Party of the Mexican Revolution and others.

This atmosphere of political projects well-defined and differentiated is maintained until the 70's. But in the late 80's, members of the PRI who disagreed with the classic "dedazo" to impose a candidate, on the pretext that differed from the neoliberal economic model of Miguel de la Madrid, was removed from the PRI and create a new party, Democratic Revolution Party, or PRD. All this with a view to the 1988 presidential election. The PRD comes with a speech clearly left the same as the simulated PRI to the people and the PAN party identified as a right.

But all this was fading. Currently, the PRI and PAN are identified from right and left-wing PRD, but this location is merely letterhead, advertising, and in recent years, these political parties and other recently emerged as the PT, the PVEM and the honeycomb, have begun to forge alliances among themselves, with the sole purpose of which is to overthrow the power. If for example the ruling PRI, then ally the PAN and the PRD. Or if the PRD rules, then the PAN can take a candidate of the PRI and the PRI nominated and adds de facto.

Thus, ideology or government projects, State, have disappeared in Mexico, and that political parties have left ideologies stored in the attic and have become machines to win elections, no matter who join, the only objective, goal and purpose is to remove the ruling and seize power . As the saying goes, "Get you to get me."

why the party system or "party-", where political parties have a monopoly on the nominations, he has no rationale, because the political projects and ideologies have disappeared to leave place to pragmatism, with the only order to take power and get rich, since corruption is inherent to these machines electioneering, as they go in pursuit of power and public recursus handled at will. Recall that in recent days the PRI and the PRD with the submission of PAN, refused to have a greater control system to manage the resources of state governments. Although Mexico is a country where there is less transparency in public management, the political class continues to refuse to review further the management of resources.

In this context, is that citizen voice calls are permitted Citizen Nominations, ie any citizen to register as a candidate for elected office without being nominated by a political party.

Obviously

Magnetic Fields Bone Spur

groping

on smooth

canvas of your back

pinto revolutions with my kisses

Lumineyes Eye Color Change

CORRUPTION (CONTINUED RE)

Jenna Jamesonnavel Piercing

reelection, FACTS AND MYTHS.

1 .- The popular representation.

Legally represent is "... to act on behalf of ...". This figure has two elements involved: the mandate and accountability. Thus, anyone who becomes a representative of someone, be in your name, obey your instructions and will have to pay accounts.

Thus, popular representation, ie represent the people, is about being for the people or the people abide by their mandate and be accountable. Once this is understood, we come to the specific situation at hand.

Mexico's President Felipe Calderon spoke last week (Nov 2009) on support for the Re-election of popular representatives. Then let me explain my views about it, hoping to give some light to read this as being a political issue and crucial to the party system that exists in Mexico, has been manipulated and distorted, looking confused and disoriented political class al ciudadano común, con el fin de que este se vea impedido de tomar una postura en base a conocimiento y criterio y así no le estorbe.

La Representación Popular en México es vía democracia directa, es decir, el voto es emitido directamente por el ciudadano eligiendo al candidato de sus preferencias. En otros países este voto es indirecto debido a que el ciudadano elige a un representante que a su vez votará por el funcionario, es el caso de los Colegios Electorales en U.S.A.

Con fundamento en la figura jurídica expuesta arriba de la representación, se entiende que la esencia de la Representación Popular es que el electo sea portavoz del ciudadano ante los cuerpos deliberativos denominados Asambleas or Congress. It is not who will make decisions on behalf of his representative, but who will abide by what his agent has told (mandate) and inform him of what he did and as he did and the outcome (accountability).

Therefore, in countries where popular representation is not legally binding, meaning that the public servant is not required by law to carry out the decisions of the city, the proxy is void as such, is lost. In Mexico in the first third of the twentieth century, members of the three powers have pushed aside the mandate and accountability, because the Mexican legal framework has gaps that allow it. If

this lack-binding corrupt ways we add the political class, then the citizen is defenseless against the decisions of public servants, being trampled and violated their civil rights.

2 .- THE VOTE OR VOTE.

In Mexico, the Federal Constitution guarantees political rights of citizens. One of them is to vote and be voted. Men and women who have reached 18 years of age have the right to vote, be voted depends for that since, as regulatory laws like the Federal Electoral Code impose restrictions on access to elective office, such as minimum age or one of the most aberrant that applicants must be nominated by a political party, which keeps our country under the control of so-called 'party. "

To exercise the right to vote, the individual must have the Federal Credential Reader, which is exhibited at the time of vote in the electoral process.

Porfirio Diaz was the President of Mexico for 30 years, since the late nineteenth century until 1910. After 30 years of governing the country, ran in the 1910 elections but was defeated by Francisco I. Madero, who was persecuted and had to leave the country. And that Diaz would not leave power and since the country was advanced in certain areas but far behind in others, 90% of the population was illiterate, the people revolted. Madero calls from exile to start a revolution against the dictator.

After several years of internal war, Mexico completed its revolution and the government issued the National Revolutionary Party (PRI now) imposed border official slogan of the revolution "effective suffrage, no reelection," leaving this testimony with that in Mexico re-election was unacceptable, since it had led to a 30-year dictatorship.